Surah Ale-Imran (The Family Of Imran ) 3 : 3

Overview (Verses 1 - 4)

The Cornerstone of the Islamic Faith

Alif. Lām. Mīm. God: there is no deity save Him, the Ever-living, the Eternal Master of all. He has revealed to you this Book with the truth, confirming what was revealed before it; and He has already revealed the Torah and the Gospel before this as guidance for people. (Verses 1-4)

We choose as the most probable explanation of the three individual letters of the Arabic alphabet, which open the sūrah, namely, Alif; Lām; Mīm, the same explanation given in our commentary on the opening passage of the preceding sūrah al-Baqarah. These letters are mentioned here in order to draw people’s attention to the fact that this book, the Qur’ān, is composed of the same type of letters as those available to the Arabs addressed by it. It remains at the same time a miraculous book which they cannot imitate despite the fact that their language is composed of the same letters. This most probable of explanations helps us understand, without difficulty, the need for such references to the nature of the Qur’ān in many sūrahs that open with individual letters. In the preceding sūrah al-Baqarah, this reference points to the challenge thrown down subsequently in the sūrah in these terms: “If you are in doubt as to what We have revealed to Our servant, then produce one sūrah comparable to it and call upon all your witnesses, other than God, if you were truthful.” (2: 23)

In this sūrah a different occasion necessitates this reference to the letters of which the Qur’ān is composed. The sūrah stresses that this Book is revealed by God, the One and only deity. It is yet composed of letters and words in the same way as earlier revelations acknowledged by their followers, who are primarily addressed by this sūrah. There is nothing new in the fact that God has chosen to reveal this Book to His Messenger in this way.

The sūrah begins with confronting the People of the Book, a Qur’ānic term used to denote people of earlier Divine revelation, especially the Jews and Christians, who deny the Prophet’s message, even though their knowledge of earlier Prophets, messages, and revelations should have made them the first to accept and believe in the new message. That should have been the case if the matter was simply one of evidence and conviction.

The first passage of the sūrah confronts these people in clear terms, dismissing all doubts they entertain or deliberately try to raise in people’s minds. It points out how these doubts press on the minds of people. It defines the attitude of true believers towards God’s message and defines the attitude of doubters and those who go astray. It vividly portrays the believers’ attitude towards their Lord and how they seek refuge with Him and appeal to Him. They know all His attributes.

“God: there is no deity save Him, the Ever-living, the Eternal Master of all.” This emphatic opening stresses the absolute oneness of God. It identifies itself as the very basic difference between the faith of Muslims and all other religions and ideologies, whether atheist and polytheist creeds or the religions of those people of the Book, Jews and Christians alike, who have gone astray. It distinguishes the faith of Islam from all other faiths, creeds and ideologies. It is also the basic difference between the way of life of Muslims and that of the followers of all other religions. It is the faith which determines the direction and the system of life in an elaborate and perfect manner.

“God: there is no deity save Him.” He has no partner in His most essential attribute of Divinity. “The Ever-living,” Who has true, self- sustaining life with absolutely no restrictions. Hence, nothing is similar to Him in this attribute. “The Eternal Master of all,” Who gives every life and sustains every existence. No life can exist in this universe without His permission.

This is the central point at issue between the Islamic faith and all other ideologies; between ascribing Divinity only to God and all the multitude of erring beliefs, including idolatry, concepts which were rife at the time in the Arabian Peninsula, as well as Jewish and Christian concepts. The Qur’ān tells us that the Jews used to say that Ezra was the son of God. Something to this effect is included in the fallacies recorded in what the Jews claim to be the Holy Book (Genesis, chapter 6). As for erroneous Christian concepts, the Qur’ān speaks of the Christian belief in the Trinity and their claim that Jesus, son of Mary, was God Himself. They also attribute Divinity to Jesus and his mother, considering them gods. They also consider their priests and monks to have Divine authority. In his book, The Preaching of Islam, Thomas Arnold refers to some of these deviant concepts.

A hundred years before, Justinian had succeeded in giving some show of unity to the Roman Empire, but after his death it rapidly fell asunder, and at this time there was an entire want of common national feeling between the provinces and the seat of government. Heraclius had made some partially successful efforts to attach Syria again to the central government, but unfortunately the general methods of re- conciliation which he adopted had served only to increase dissension instead of allaying it. Religious Passions were the only existing substitute for national feeling, and he tried, by propounding an exposition of faith, that was intended to serve as an eirenicon, to stop all further dispute between the contending factions and unite the heretics to the Orthodox Church and to the central government. The Council of Chalcedon (451) had maintained that Christ was “to be acknowledged in two natures, without confusion, change, diversion or separation; the difference of the natures being in nowise taken away by reason of their union, but rather the properties of each nature being preserved, and concurring into one person and one substance, not as it were divided or separated into two persons, but one and the same Son and only begotten, God the Word.” The council was rejected by the Monophysites, who only allowed one nature in the person of Christ, who was said to be a composite person, having all attributes divine and human, but the substance bearing these attributes was no longer a duality, but a composite unity. The controversy between the orthodox party and the Monophysites, who flourished particularly in Egypt and Syria and in countries outside the Byzantine empire, had been hotly contested for nearly two centuries, when Heraclius sought to effect a reconciliation by means of the doctrine of Monotheism: while conceding the duality of the natures, it secured unity of the person in the actual life of Christ, by the rejection of two series of activities in this one person; the one Christ and Son of God effectuates that which is human and that which is divine by one divine human agency, i.e., there is only one will in the Incarnate Word.

As for deviation in the beliefs of idolaters, the Qur’ān speaks of their worship of the jinn, the angels, the sun, the moon and idols. The least deviant in all their beliefs being the assertion by some of them that they only worshipped these idols in order that they would act as intermediaries endearing them to God.

It confronting such a great heap of erring beliefs and deviant concepts, Islam declares in the clearest and strongest of terms: “God: there is no deity save Him, the Ever-living, the Eternal Master of all.” As we have said, this declaration identifies the central point at issue in matters of faith. Moreover, it is the departing point for different ways of life and codes of behaviour. When belief in the existence of God, the only God Who is Ever-living, and Who is the Eternal Master from Whom every life and every existence are derived and Who controls every living thing, is firmly established in someone’s mind, his way of life must, by necessity, be totally different from that of a person who holds to any of the confused and erring concepts. The latter cannot feel the influence on his life of the Divine Being, the One, who is actually in control of his life. With the concept of the absolute oneness of God, submission to anyone other than Him is inadmissible. There can be no room for deriving any laws or systems, moral values, economic or social systems except from God. He is the only One to Whom we turn for guidance in every matter which concerns this life or in what follows this life. With all other confused beliefs and concepts there is no one to whom we may turn. There are no boundaries distinguishing right from wrong, what is forbidden from what is lawful. All these can be determined only when the source from which they are derived is determined. For it is that source to which we turn for guidance and to which we submit ourselves in total obedience.

Hence, it was necessary to put the issue very clearly right at the outset: “God: there is no deity save Him, the Ever-living, the Eternal Master of all.” This is, indeed, what gives Islamic life its unique character, one which is not confined to the realm of beliefs only. All aspects of Islamic life are derived from this basic Islamic concept of the total and absolute oneness of God. This concept cannot be truly established in our minds unless its practical influence is felt in our lives, starting with deriving our laws which relate to all fields of life from God alone, and turning to Him for guidance in every sphere of life.

When the central issue is thus resolved by the declaration of the absolute oneness of God and outlining His unique attributes, which no one shares with Him, are outlined, the sūrah moves on to speak of the unity of the source from which all religions, Scriptures and Divine messages are revealed. That is to say the source of the revealed code implemented throughout all generations of human life.